Swedish citizens have suffered more than 31,800 adverse reactions caused by CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Virus vaccines in just a few months, setting a record over the past four years, the Swedish Medical Products Agency reported.
Worse still, an official at the Agency, Ebba Hallberg, suspects that there may be an attempt to reduce reporting of the actual numbers affected, with only the most “severe” cases being reported according to SVT Nyheter and Zerohedge media quoted on May 18.
It is also striking that although Sweden offers all three vaccines, Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. The latter pharmaceutical company has the highest percentage of cases of side reactions.
Thus, 63% of the adverse events reported were due to AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria vaccine. This figure is even more disproportionate considering that they represent 26% of the total of about 2.7 million vaccines injected in Sweden.
Sweden had temporarily suspended the use of these experimental drugs because they were causing abnormal blood clotting in recipients.
But Sweden reintroduced it after the European Medicines Agency (EMA) tested it and insisted that the vaccine was safe.
For citizens, the thousands of deaths and the much higher number of adverse cases caused by vaccines generate doubts and indecision about whether to be vaccinated. A high percentage of the population chooses not to do so.
There is also a lot of official information in circulation that increases suspicions about the advisability of taking such treatment, for example.
The Connecticut Department of Public Health published the list of ingredients of the Moderna COVID vaccine, and that fact sheet confirms that it contains the chemical “SM-102.”
According to the product description, the manufacturer, Cayman Chem, warns, “This product is not for human or veterinary use,” referring to SM-102.
“SM-102 is an ionizable amino lipid that has been used in combination with other lipids in the formation of lipid nanoparticles,” it describes.
It adds, “1 Administration of luciferase mRNA in SM-102-containing lipid nanoparticles induces hepatic luciferase expression in mice. Formulations containing SM-102 have been used in the development of lipid nanoparticles for delivery of mRNA-based vaccines.”
Along these lines, Twitter user @McDaddy99 makes his logical arguments and questions the need to take the vaccine in one of his posts.
“Great, here’s a Q, why should I get a vaccine when I’ve served 150 customers everyday since 2020, never been sick, watched as Sweden, south dakota, florida proved lockdown doesn’t work, seen the virus has a high survival rate, witnessed our rights taken, and seen death on VAERS?” he argued.
Great, heres a Q, why should I get a vaccine when I've served 150 customers everyday since 2020, never been sick, watched as Sweden, south dakota, florida proved lockdown doesn't work, seen the virus has a high survival rate, witnessed our rights taken, and seen death on vaers?
— Lee Mc Donald (@McDaddy99) May 2, 2021
One of the responses sent to @McDaddy99 by netizen @Took415 comments that according to Harvard, the side effects are “only” 1%. However, official data from Sweden exceeds that percentage and is suspected to be much higher.
“You don’t know what the safety profile is yet. Clinical trials running until 2022-23 and Harvard study found VAERS reporting just 1%,” wrote @Took415.
You don’t know what the safety profile is yet. Clinical trials running until 2022-23 and Harvard study found VAERS reporting just 1%.
— Let (@Took415) May 3, 2021