Patients might experience adverse reactions after being immunized against COVID-19, a conservative lobby group warns.

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) warned anyone thinking about being vaccinating against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Virus should reconsider.

Primary health professionals detailed several cases where three experimental CCP Virus vaccines caused viral shedding, irregular vaginal bleeding, and even brain damage. This was despite the vaccines already having U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval under the Emergency Use Authorization Act.

In a new study called “Identifying post-vaccination complications and their causes: an analysis of COVID-19 patient data,” AFLDS researcher Dain Pascocello revealed the vaccine creates “many trillions” of spike proteins that can exit the body and infect close contacts who have not been vaccinated.

“The particles have the ability to create inflammation and disease in these contacts,” he said in the study. “In other words, the spike proteins are pathogenic (disease causing) just like the full virus.”

The researcher is particularly concerned about the intensity of these “13 trillion” particles.

“The spike proteins bind more tightly than the fully intact virus,” he said. “Because of the biomimicry (similarity) on the spike, shedding appears to be causing [a] wide variety of autoimmune disease[s] (where the body attacks its own tissue) in some persons.”

Pascocello also believes the vaccine is linked to many cases of irregular vaginal bleeding, postmenopausal vaginal bleeding, and miscarriages in women.

“There is so much reporting of vaginal bleeding post-vaccination that it is clear a connection between the vaccine and irregular bleeding exists,” he said.

However, the FDA appears to be more concerned about blood-clotting in some patients.

“Despite this clear-cut evidence, menstrual-cycle changes were not listed among the FDA’s common side effects in its phase-three clinical participants,” the researcher said. “Women’s reproductive health needs to be taken seriously rather than waved away by agenda-driven public health officials.”

In addition to this, there is growing concern about the potential for spike proteins and lipid nanoparticles, which carry the messenger RNA (mRNA) genetic sequence into cells, to pass through the “blood-brain barrier” and cause neurological damage.

“Crossing the blood-brain barrier places patients at risk of chronic inflammation and thrombosis (clotting) in the neurological system, contributing to tremors, chronic lethargy, stroke, Bell’s Palsy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-type symptoms,” Pascocello said. “Lipid nanoparticles can potentially fuse with brain cells, resulting in delayed neuro-degenerative disease, and the mRNA-induced spike protein can bind to brain tissue 10 to 20 times stronger than the spike proteins that are (naturally) part of the original virus.”

AFLDS maintains thousands of adverse effects have been linked to CCP Virus vaccines. These have already been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

“Yet these complications have received a fraction of the attention paid to Johnson & Johnson’s blood-clotting controversy,” Pascocello said before adding, “Why?”

The researcher suggested some side-effects could have been avoided if the CCP Virus adopted a more conventional attenuated antigen response instead of more experimental spike proteins.

“It takes years to be sure something new is safe,” he said. “No one knows definitively the long-term health implications for the body and brain, especially among the young, related to this spike protein. In addition, if documented problems with the protein do arise, there will never be any way to reverse the adverse effects in those already vaccinated.”

AFLDS believes at least one pharmaceutical giant knew spike proteins could cause viral shedding. Founder Simone Gold shared results from Pfizer’s experimental trials on social media that show the company acknowledging this future shedding mechanism.

One can be “exposed to the study intervention due to environmental exposure,” which includes “inhalation or skin contact” with a study participant or someone who has been exposed in the same way, according to the results.

Sign up to receive our latest news!

By submitting this form, I agree to the terms.